ISSN 2078-9823 (Print), ISSN 2587-7879 (Online)

DOI: 10.15507/2078-9823.058.022.202202.117-127

Nikolay M. Arsentyev

National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University (Saransk, Russia),

е-mail: director_isi@bk.ru

 

School Textbooks on the National History of Russia and EU Countries in the late XX – early XXI Century as a Dialogue Between Science and Politics

 

Abstract

Introduction. One of the priorities in the development of modern historical education in the context of the globalization of the humanities space has become the formation of social practices that make it possible to discuss and coordinate world, national, regional and local content in the content of textbooks on Russian history. When organizing the system of teaching history in schools in Russia and EU countries, the position of the state is still decisive everywhere. The need to form a consensus in the interpretation of the past is caused by the growth of confrontation due to the polarization of public discourse and the growth of international tension. The increased attention of the world community to the politics of memory has intensified the interest of researchers in this topic.

Methods. The methodological basis of the work was formed by modern methods of analysis of the historical and cultural heritage of the past. The study was carried out in line with the concepts that substantiate the periodic replacement of the ideals of education and upbringing, depending on the nature of state authorities. When studying the meanings of the ongoing modernization of historical education, the content analysis of media publications was widely used. The principles of historicism, objectivity, and consistency made it possible to fully, deeply and comprehensively consider the object of study in the context of modern development.

Discussion and Conclusion. The study has showed that school history education in the early 2020s still remains a conflict field in which the interests of states, interstate associations, public and confessional structures oppose in a variety of manifestations of influence on the formation of the worldview of young people. From 1996 to 2006, the modernization of historical education in Russia took place within the framework of the project “European Dimension in the Study of History”. Since 2007, a new intergovernmental educational project “Image of the Other in History Teaching” has been planned for three years, aimed at adapting the school process to the conditions of growing cultural diversity. However, in 2006, with the creation of a new historical and cultural educational standard on behalf of President Vladimir Putin, the reform of the school system of historical education no longer fit into the program for creating Greater Europe. Nevertheless, cooperation with the European Union in coordinating the content of school textbooks was continued. To prevent the deepening radicalization of public consciousness, our country, among 17 participating states, became a co-organizer of the Observatory for the Teaching of History, created at the initiative of France in November 2020, and on October 4–5, 2021, the First World Congress of School Teachers of History was held in Moscow. A study of the significant experience of cooperation between the Russian Federation and the European Union in the field of school education that has been accumulated since 1996 shows that a coordinated policy of memory is possible only with the expansion of cooperation between historians, a dialogue of specialists in the search for consensus on the most debatable and difficult to resolve issues in the history of Greater Europe, as well as the desire of politicians to peaceful coexistence and stability, the development of guarantees of equal security.

Keywords: school history education in the European Union and Russia, the politics of memory, the Observatory for the Teaching of History, the First World Congress of School Teachers on History, school history textbooks, public historical consciousness.

For citation: Arsentyev N. M. School textbooks on the national history of Russia and EU countries in the late XX – early XXI century as a dialogue between science and politics. Gumanitarian: aktual’nye problemy gumanitarnoi nauki i obrazovaniia = Russian Journal of the Humanities. 2022; 22(2): 117–127. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.15507/2078-9823.058.022.202202.117-127.

 

References

1. Vyazemsky E. E. The problem of falsification of the history of Russia and general historical education: theoretical and practical aspects. Problemy sovremennogo obrazovaniya = Problems of modern education. 2012; 1: 28–43. (In Russ.)

2. Vyazemsky E. E., Strelova O. Yu. Theory and methods of teaching history. Moscow, 2003, 382 p. (In Russ.)

3. Ivashchenko A. S. Evolution of the functions of historical science in the late XX – early XXI century. Golos minuvshego = Voice of the past. 2014; (3-4): 208–215. (In Russ.)

4. Medushevsky N. A. Reflections on the politics of memory: Collection of works. Ed. Solutions. 2019, 142 p. (In Russ.)

5. Perevezentsev S. V. The invention of history. Rossiya v global’noj politike = Russia in global politics. 2017; 15(3): 207–221. (In Russ.)

6. Savelyeva I. M., Poletaev A. V. History and time: In search of the lost. Moscow, 1997, 796 p. (In Russ.)

7. Stradling R. Teaching the History of Europe in the 20th century. Materials for the Seminar “Training History Teachers for Work in a Multicultural Environment”. Tomsk, 2005, 262 p. (In Russ.)

8. Stradling R. Problems of teaching history in the XXI century. Vremya = Time. 2003; 4: 123–126. (In Russ.)

9. Tishkov V. A. New historical culture (reflections after the XXI International Congress of Historical Sciences). Novaya i novejshaya istoriya = New and Modern History. 2011; 2: 3–23. (In Russ.)

10. Ferro M. How the story is told to children in different countries of the world. Moscow, 2010,  463 p. (In Russ.)

 

Download article in PDF